NewsWorld
PredictionsDigestsScorecardTimelinesArticles
NewsWorld
HomePredictionsDigestsScorecardTimelinesArticlesWorldTechnologyPoliticsBusiness
AI-powered predictive news aggregation© 2026 NewsWorld. All rights reserved.
Trending
TrumpFebruaryMilitaryStrikesCampaignProtestsNewsTariffDigestSundayTimelinePartyHealthIranCrisisOnePolicyDespiteLaunchTargetsPublicIranianNuclearDigital
TrumpFebruaryMilitaryStrikesCampaignProtestsNewsTariffDigestSundayTimelinePartyHealthIranCrisisOnePolicyDespiteLaunchTargetsPublicIranianNuclearDigital
All Articles
New Scientist
Published 6 days ago

The mystery of nuclear 'magic numbers' has finally been resolved

New Scientist · Feb 16, 2026 · Collected from RSS

Summary

A mathematical equivalent of a microscope with variable resolution has shed light on why some atoms are exceptionally stable, a riddle that has persisted in nuclear physics for decades

Full Article

Some atoms seem to be particularly stable because of their numbers of protons and neutronsShutterstock/ktsdesign A special set of numbers has formed the backbone of nuclear physics research for decades, and now we finally know how it arises from the quantum mix of nuclear particles and forces. Nearly 80 years ago, physicist Maria Goeppert Mayer showed that when the nucleus of an atom contains certain numbers of protons and neutrons, such as 50 or 82, it becomes exceptionally stable. In the years since, researchers amassed evidence of more such “magic numbers”, which are found in the most stable, and therefore most abundant, elements in our universe. Goeppert Mayer and her contemporaries explained these numbers by proposing that protons and neutrons occupy discrete energy levels, or shells. This model, which is still used to interpret many nuclear physics experiments, treats each particle in the nucleus as independent, but our best quantum theories assert that particles within nuclei actually interact strongly. Jiangming Yao at Sun Yat-sen University in China and his colleagues have now resolved this contradiction and, in the process, elucidated how magic numbers emerge from these interactions. Yao says the shell model relies on input from experiments and doesn’t encode details of interactions between each particle. Instead, he and his team started their calculations from first principles, which means they mathematically described how particles interact with each other, how they stick together and how much energy is needed to move them apart in more detail. The two descriptions are analogous to images taken at low and high resolution, respectively, says Yao. “Before, people directly modelled the system at low resolution, or they tried to understand nuclear structure at high resolution. We used modern methods to build the bridge between these descriptions.” He and his colleagues started with the high-resolution description, gradually made it blurrier in each step of the calculation and tracked how the structure the particles formed changed. As they moved across their mathematical bridge, the researchers saw the symmetry of the particle’s quantum states change – drawing a graph based on the equations for these states would produce shapes with different symmetries at different resolutions. This change resulted in a nuclear structure that was at its most stable when particles grouped themselves in magic numbers. Jean-Paul Ebran at the French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission says this work offers a theoretical probe – a mathematical microscope of sorts – that mirrors how experiments work. “Nature looks different depending on the resolution at which you observe. This [study] really maps onto what we do experimentally.” The change in symmetry that the researchers identified is related to effects described by Albert Einstein’s theory of special relativity, thus painting an even fuller picture of how magic numbers marry together different facets of nuclear theory, says Ebran. So far, the researchers have tested their theoretical work on a type of tin that is doubly magic because its nuclei each contain 50 protons and 82 neutrons, as well as on several additional nuclei. Going forward, they want to extend their analysis to heavier atomic nuclei, which are typically unstable, and study processes by which heavy nuclei are created in exploding stars or merging neutron stars, says Yao. Topics:


Share this story

Read Original at New Scientist

Related Articles

New Scientist2 days ago
Fish-based pet food may expose cats and dogs to forever chemicals

A survey of 100 commercial foods for dogs and cats revealed that PFAS chemicals appear in numerous brands and types, with fish-based products among those with the highest levels

New Scientist2 days ago
We've spotted the strongest microwave laser in the known universe

Colliding galaxies can create a beam of focused microwave radiation known as a maser, and astronomers have discovered the brightest one ever seen

New Scientist2 days ago
Fresh understanding of the causes of migraine reveals new drug targets

New insights into the causes of migraine is prompting a fresh look at a drug target that was sidelined 25 years ago

New Scientist2 days ago
Search for radio signals finds no hint of alien civilisation on K2-18b

Planet K2-18b, an apparent water world 124 light years away, has been seen as a promising location in the search for aliens, but telescopes on Earth failed to pick up any radio transmissions

New Scientist2 days ago
Ultra-processed foods could be making you age faster

We’ve been missing an important contributor to ageing, says columnist Graham Lawton. Ultra-processed foods are known to be associated with many chronic health problems, but studies have now shown they may also speed up ageing

New Scientist3 days ago
New fossils may settle debate over mysterious sail-backed spinosaurs

Spinosaurs have sometimes been portrayed as swimmers or divers, but a new species of these dinosaurs bolsters the idea that they were more like gigantic herons