NewsWorld
PredictionsDigestsScorecardTimelinesArticles
NewsWorld
HomePredictionsDigestsScorecardTimelinesArticlesWorldTechnologyPoliticsBusiness
AI-powered predictive news aggregation© 2026 NewsWorld. All rights reserved.
Trending
AlsTrumpFebruaryMajorDane'sResearchElectionCandidateCampaignPartyStrikesNewsDigestSundayTimelineLaunchesPrivateGlobalCongressionalCrisisPoliticalEricBlueCredit
AlsTrumpFebruaryMajorDane'sResearchElectionCandidateCampaignPartyStrikesNewsDigestSundayTimelineLaunchesPrivateGlobalCongressionalCrisisPoliticalEricBlueCredit
All Articles
The cost of living crisis is still Britain defining political challenge
labourlist.org
Published 6 days ago

The cost of living crisis is still Britain defining political challenge

labourlist.org · Feb 16, 2026 · Collected from GDELT

Summary

Published: 20260216T104500Z

Full Article

Scandal and speculation continue to grip Westminster this week. But beyond the bubble, one issue matters more to the public than anything else: the cost of living. New polling by the Cost of Living Action campaign (COLA) shows that the cost of living is by far the most pressing issue for people in the UK: a huge 63% cite it as one of the top three most important issues to them personally – significantly outstripping the number of people who said health (38%) or immigration and asylum (37%). Yet for some in Westminster, the cost of living crisis is seen as a temporary problem that’s long since faded into irrelevance. Political attention spans can be short, and it feels like a lifetime ago that the crisis erupted with soaring energy bills in 2022. But in reality, the cost of living crisis is far from over. In fact, it’s worse. COLA’s survey reveals that almost two thirds of people have cut back on essentials like groceries and utilities. Half or more say it’s harder to pay their energy bills or to afford other essentials than five years ago. READ MORE: ‘Every Lidl helps: What can the Government do to bring down food prices?’ Most starkly, 40% of the public have £100 or less at the end of each month after paying for bills and essentials. Nearly 10% are left with no money at all, while 5% are forced into debt after paying for these unavoidable costs. This breadth and depth of hardship is completely unacceptable in a country as wealthy as the UK. It should come as no surprise, then, that people are miserable and angry. Close to two thirds of the public think the current government has handled the crisis badly, and over 40% hold them most responsible for it. The political consequences of failing to bring down the cost of living are huge. This crisis didn’t have a single origin. It may have been catalysed by the huge spike in energy bills and ensuing high inflation back in 2022, but other drivers like housing costs, anaemic wage growth and cuts to social security have been around for much longer. Like the mythical hydra, it’s a beast with multiple heads. And in the absence of Hercules, tackling it will require multiple solutions. Our research found widespread support for a range of policies that address the root causes of the crisis. 63% of the public support cutting energy bills by cracking down on profiteering and shifting to ownership for the public benefit. A similar number – 60% – are in favour of bringing wages in line with the cost of living and introducing fair pay agreements across the economy. Both policies were opposed by only 11% of the public. A strong majority (56% in favour vs 13% against) back bringing housing costs down with large-scale social housebuilding and private rent controls – including majorities among owner occupiers, private renters and social renters. More than half (53%) also support increasing the social security minimum to ensure that everyone can afford the essentials – over three times as many who oppose (17%). Over 50% of the public also want to see these policies funded via more and better taxes on wealth, targeting the super rich, fossil fuels and banks. Subscribe here to our daily newsletter roundup of Labour news, analysis and comment– and follow us on TikTok, Bluesky, WhatsApp, X and Facebook. Strikingly, all of these policies are supported by the majority of people intending to vote Labour at the next general election and the majority of people intending to vote for Reform. In other words, they’re popular across the political spectrum. A government which is looking to hang onto its voters and persuade others to support it again should take note. As Yuan Yang MP, who’s working with the campaign and is co-convenor of the Living Standards Coalition in Parliament, says, this research “has identified a critical challenge for those of us in Westminster to grapple with: that we need a holistic approach in order to create growth while tackling the cost of living crisis. This approach requires increasing incomes, reducing costs, and fairer taxation.” More than a decade of cuts to public services and social security under previous governments have eaten into the fabric of our country. Millions of people have seen their wages stagnate, their costs go up and their living standards fall – all while wealth and power grows increasingly concentrated at the top of society. Things cannot go on like this. After nearly two years of being on the back foot, now is the time for the government to be bold and deal with this crisis with the urgency it demands. Share your thoughts. Contribute on this story or tell your own by writing to our Editor. The best letters every week will be published on the site. Find out how to get your letter published. SHARE: If you have anything to share that we should be looking into or publishing about this story – or any other topic involving Labour– contact us (strictly anonymously if you wish) at [email protected]. SUBSCRIBE: Sign up to LabourList’s morning email here for the best briefing on everything Labour, every weekday morning. DONATE: If you value our work, please chip in a few pounds a week and become one of our supporters, helping sustain and expand our coverage. PARTNER: If you or your organisation might be interested in partnering with us on sponsored events or projects, email [email protected]. ADVERTISE: If your organisation would like to advertise or run sponsored pieces on LabourList‘s daily newsletter or website, contact our exclusive ad partners Total Politics at [email protected]. Value our free and unique service? LabourList has more readers than ever before - but we need your support. Our dedicated coverage of Labour's policies and personalities, internal debates, selections and elections relies on donations from our readers. Support LabourList


Share this story

Read Original at labourlist.org

Related Articles

labourlist.org4 days ago
Turning the page ? Labour recovery in the polls show a path to 2029 victory

Published: 20260218T154500Z

labourlist.org7 days ago
Letters to the Editor – week ending 15th February 2026

Published: 20260215T203000Z

South China Morning Postabout 2 hours ago
Why the Fed credibility crisis will hit emerging markets harder

As political pressure on the US Federal Reserve intensifies in Washington, the reverberations are rippling across the globe. Gregory Peters, co-chief investment officer of fixed income at PGIM, has noted that bringing political pressure to bear on the Fed is an “own goal” – a self-inflicted shock that erodes confidence and is unlikely to deliver lower borrowing costs for the US. This reassessment – marked by quiet “sell America” trades – is beginning to surface. The damage extends far beyond...

livescience.comabout 16 hours ago
The limits of human longevity have still not been reached , study suggests

Published: 20260221T181500Z

Engadgetabout 17 hours ago
A judge ruled Tesla still has to pay $243 million for a fatal crash involving Autopilot

Tesla is still on the hook for $243 million after a US judge rejected the EV maker's bid to overturn a jury verdict from last year. On Friday, US District Judge Beth Bloom upheld the jury's decision to hold Tesla partially responsible for a deadly crash that happened in 2019 and involved the self-driving Autopilot feature. The judge added that there was enough evidence to support the jury's verdict, which was delivered in August 2025 and ordered Tesla to pay millions in compensatory and punitive damages to the two victims in the case. Judge Bloom added that Tesla didn't present any new arguments to dispute the decision.  While the case has been moving along recently, the incident dates back to several years ago when the driver of a Model S, George McGee, was using Tesla's Autopilot feature while bending down to retrieve a dropped phone. The Model S then crashed into an SUV that was parked on a shoulder, where Naibel Benavides Leon and Dillon Angulo were standing aside. Benavides was killed in the crash, while Angulo was severely injured. Tesla hasn't publicly commented on Judge Bloom's decision yet, but it won't be a surprise to see the company appeal the latest ruling with a higher court. Tesla's lawyers previously tried to pin the blame on the driver, claiming that the Model S and Autopilot weren't defective. As this major case plays out, Tesla is also facing several investigations from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration for both its Autopilot and Full-Self Driving features. This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/transportation/evs/a-judge-ruled-tesla-still-has-to-pay-243-million-for-a-fatal-crash-involving-autopilot-174548093.html?src=rss

Politico Europeabout 19 hours ago
Top NATO allies believe cyberattacks on hospitals are an act of war. They’re still struggling to fight back.

State-linked hackers are increasingly targeting critical sectors with no signs of stopping.