NewsWorld
PredictionsDigestsScorecardTimelinesArticles
NewsWorld
HomePredictionsDigestsScorecardTimelinesArticlesWorldTechnologyPoliticsBusiness
AI-powered predictive news aggregation© 2026 NewsWorld. All rights reserved.
Trending
FebruaryChinaSignificantMilitaryTimelineDigestFaceDiplomaticFederalTurkeyFridayTrumpDrugGovernanceTensionsCompanyStateIranParticularlyEscalatingCaliforniaTargetingNuclearDespite
FebruaryChinaSignificantMilitaryTimelineDigestFaceDiplomaticFederalTurkeyFridayTrumpDrugGovernanceTensionsCompanyStateIranParticularlyEscalatingCaliforniaTargetingNuclearDespite
All Articles
Human brain cells on a chip learned to play Doom in a week
New Scientist
Published about 11 hours ago

Human brain cells on a chip learned to play Doom in a week

New Scientist · Feb 27, 2026 · Collected from RSS

Summary

Neuron-powered computer chips can now be easily programmed to play a first-person shooter game, bringing biological computers a step closer to useful applications

Full Article

A screen image of Doom being played by human neurons on a chipCortical Labs A clump of human brain cells can play the classic computer game Doom. While its performance is not up to par with humans, experts say it brings biological computers a step closer to useful real-world applications, like controlling robot arms. In 2021, the Australian company Cortical Labs used its neuron-powered computer chips to play Pong. The chips consisted of clumps of more than 800,000 living brain cells grown on top of microelectrode arrays that can both send and receive electrical signals. Researchers had to carefully train the chips to control the paddles on either side of the screen. Now, Cortical Labs has developed an interface that makes it easier to program these chips using the popular programming language Python. An independent developer, Sean Cole, then used Python to teach the chips to play Doom, which he did in around a week. “Unlike the Pong work that we did a few years ago, which represented years of painstaking scientific effort, this demonstration has been done in a matter of days by someone who previously had relatively little expertise working directly with biology,” says Brett Kagan of Cortical Labs. “It’s this accessibility and this flexibility that makes it truly exciting.” The neuronal computer chip, which used about a quarter as many neurons as the Pong demonstration, played Doom better than a randomly firing player, but far below the performance of the best human players. However, it learnt much faster than traditional, silicon-based machine learning systems and should be able to improve its performance with newer learning algorithms, says Kagan. However, it’s not useful to compare the chips with human brains, he says. “Yes, it’s alive, and yes, it’s biological, but really what it is being used as is a material that can process information in very special ways that we can’t recreate in silicon.” “Doom is vastly more complex than earlier demonstrations, and successfully interacting with it highlights real advances in how living neural systems can be controlled and trained,” says Andrew Adamatzky at the University of the West of England in Bristol, UK. Steve Furber at the University of Manchester, UK, agrees that Doom is a significant level up from playing Pong, but he says there is still a lot we don’t understand about how these neurons are playing the game, such as how the neurons know what is expected of them or how they can “see” the screen with no eyes. Even so, the jump in capability is exciting, says Yoshikatsu Hayashi at the University of Reading, UK, and brings us significantly closer to useful real-world applications, such as controlling a robotic arm with biological computers, a task which Hayashi and his colleagues are attempting with a similar computer made from jelly-like hydrogel. “[Playing Doom] is like a simpler version of controlling a whole arm,” says Hayashi. “What’s exciting here is not just that a biological system can play Doom, but that it can cope with complexity, uncertainty, and real-time decision-making,” says Adamatzky. “That’s much closer to the kinds of challenges future biological or hybrid computers will need to handle.” Topics:


Share this story

Read Original at New Scientist

Related Articles

New Scientistabout 10 hours ago
NASA’s Artemis moon exploration programme is getting a major makeover

As it faces yet another set of delays, NASA’s Artemis programme is being shaken up, delaying an actual moon landing in favour of smaller, faster steps forward

New Scientistabout 11 hours ago
Frailty can be eased with an infusion of stem cells from young people

Frailty can typically only be lessened through lifestyle changes, but a stem cell therapy seems to target the underlying causes of the condition, boosting the mobility of frail older people

New Scientistabout 15 hours ago
Ocean geoengineering trial finds no evidence of harm to marine life

Pouring 65,000 litres of sodium hydroxide into the Gulf of Maine removed up to 10 tonnes of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere without harming wildlife, according to the researchers behind an ocean alkalinity enhancement test

New Scientistabout 16 hours ago
How worried should you be about an asteroid smashing into Earth?

The dinosaurs were wiped out by an asteroid, but does that mean we risk suffering the same fate - and should you be worried about the possibility? Leah Crane sets the matter straight

New Scientistabout 17 hours ago
Our verdict on Juice by Tim Winton: Australian climate novel is a hit

The New Scientist Book Club enjoyed our February read, Tim Winton's far-future-set Juice. Head of books Alison Flood rounds up member thoughts

New Scientistabout 17 hours ago
'If a drug had the same benefits as the arts, we’d take it every day'

As the New Scientist Book Club embarks on its read for March, Art Cure, author Daisy Fancourt gives a sneak preview into the myriad ways in which the arts can improve our health