NewsWorld
PredictionsDigestsScorecardTimelinesArticles
NewsWorld
HomePredictionsDigestsScorecardTimelinesArticlesWorldTechnologyPoliticsBusiness
AI-powered predictive news aggregation© 2026 NewsWorld. All rights reserved.
Trending
FebruaryChinaSignificantMilitaryTimelineDigestFaceDiplomaticFederalTurkeyFridayTrumpDrugGovernanceTensionsCompanyStateIranParticularlyEscalatingCaliforniaTargetingNuclearDespite
FebruaryChinaSignificantMilitaryTimelineDigestFaceDiplomaticFederalTurkeyFridayTrumpDrugGovernanceTensionsCompanyStateIranParticularlyEscalatingCaliforniaTargetingNuclearDespite
All Articles
How worried should you be about an asteroid smashing into Earth?
New Scientist
Published about 17 hours ago

How worried should you be about an asteroid smashing into Earth?

New Scientist · Feb 27, 2026 · Collected from RSS

Summary

The dinosaurs were wiped out by an asteroid, but does that mean we risk suffering the same fate - and should you be worried about the possibility? Leah Crane sets the matter straight

Full Article

Could this dramatic image ever happen for real?angel_nt/Getty Images Somewhere, out in the cold depths of space, there is a space rock that could destroy a large chunk of life on Earth. Is this fate inevitable? Could we find a way to stop it, or will we eventually suffer the same fate as the dinosaurs? And should this existential threat be keeping you up at night? Here’s what we know. The asteroid that killed the dinosaurs 66 million years ago was at least 10 kilometres across, big enough to cause megatsunamis, ignite enormous forest fires and darken the skies the world over. Asteroids of that size are estimated to hit Earth about every 60 million years, based on the planet’s crater record. For the next size class down, asteroids about 1 kilometre across, estimates suggest they hit Earth about every million years, and the most recent one was about 900,000 years ago. Those numbers are enough to make you nervous. But one of the things that sets humanity apart from the dinosaurs is our ability to look out into space and interpret what we see there. Naturally, researchers around the world have used this ability to attempt to learn how many asteroids are out there and what proportion of them are on trajectories that could be dangerous. The good news is that, of the thousands of near-Earth objects that astronomers are tracking, there are only about 35 with more than a 1-in-a-million chance of hitting Earth in the next 100 years. The even better news is that all of those still have extremely small chances of coming for us, and nearly all of them are less than 100 metres across. So, will an apocalyptic asteroid hit in our lifetimes? Almost certainly not. Nevertheless, the eagle-eyed reader will have noted caveats like “of the asteroids we’re tracking” and “small chances” and “nearly” and “almost” and, accordingly, won’t have heaved a sigh of relief just yet. That is in large part because we can’t be sure that we have detected every asteroid, as is regularly proven by breathless headlines stating that a newfound rock is headed straight towards Earth – although they are usually not-so-near misses and pass harmlessly by. To calculate the proportion of asteroids we have found, astronomers use three figures: the number that we have found, the volume of sky that has been searched and the strength of our telescopes. Using those, it is estimated that we have spotted all of the asteroids 10 kilometres across or bigger that could pose a danger to Earth, so now you can breathe that sigh of relief: it is deeply unlikely we will suffer the same fate as the dinosaurs. Of the asteroids that are 1 kilometre across, we have detected about 80 per cent, so it is fairly unlikely any of those are going to pop up unexpectedly. Anything smaller than 100 metres poses negligible danger and would probably burn up in the atmosphere on its way in or cause minor damage if it hit, like the Chelyabinsk meteor in 2013. The 100-metre “city-killers” are more of a problem, however, as we have detected less than half of them that might be lurking around. If you are going to be worried about asteroids, those are the ones of concern. Thankfully, there is another thing that sets us apart from the dinosaurs: the technology we have developed to actually go to space. The first way that protects us is through space telescopes keeping an eye out for any space rocks that might be on their way towards Earth. All sorts of telescopes keep watch while going about their other observations, but a dedicated one called NEO Surveyor is planned to launch next year, and that should drastically improve the numbers of asteroids that we can keep track of. The second way spacefaring protects us is by providing options should we actually find something heading for impact. NASA’s 2022 Double Asteroid Redirection Test smashed into an asteroid to push it off course, demonstrating that we can, in fact, move one of these space rocks if we have to. If we spot one coming towards us with sufficient time to spare, which would mean at least a couple of years, we should be able to shift its trajectory so it passes by. If we did fail to prevent the asteroid hitting Earth, it would be a natural disaster, but a predictable one. Chances are it would hit the ocean or an uninhabited area – after all, according to the World Economic Forum, less than 15 per cent of the world’s land area (which is less than 4.3 per cent of its total surface area) has been modified by humans, much less inhabited. If the asteroid were heading for one of those few inhabited areas, we would have the same options we do for any natural disaster: evacuate, mitigate, shelter in place. Shoring up our disaster response capabilities would help prepare for that possibility, with the useful side effect of helping us respond to the many other disasters that are both more likely and harder to predict. So, back to the questions that started all this off. Is the asteroid inevitable? Absolutely. Is there a solution? Very possibly. Are we eventually to suffer the same fate as the dinosaurs? If we are, it will be in the far-distant future. But worrying about that won’t change any of it one bit. Instead of stewing in our anxiety, we can prepare now by learning how best to deal with natural disasters more generally – and letting the astronomers keep their watchful eyes on the skies. Topics:


Share this story

Read Original at New Scientist

Related Articles

New Scientistabout 11 hours ago
NASA’s Artemis moon exploration programme is getting a major makeover

As it faces yet another set of delays, NASA’s Artemis programme is being shaken up, delaying an actual moon landing in favour of smaller, faster steps forward

New Scientistabout 13 hours ago
Frailty can be eased with an infusion of stem cells from young people

Frailty can typically only be lessened through lifestyle changes, but a stem cell therapy seems to target the underlying causes of the condition, boosting the mobility of frail older people

New Scientistabout 13 hours ago
Human brain cells on a chip learned to play Doom in a week

Neuron-powered computer chips can now be easily programmed to play a first-person shooter game, bringing biological computers a step closer to useful applications

New Scientistabout 17 hours ago
Ocean geoengineering trial finds no evidence of harm to marine life

Pouring 65,000 litres of sodium hydroxide into the Gulf of Maine removed up to 10 tonnes of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere without harming wildlife, according to the researchers behind an ocean alkalinity enhancement test

New Scientistabout 19 hours ago
Our verdict on Juice by Tim Winton: Australian climate novel is a hit

The New Scientist Book Club enjoyed our February read, Tim Winton's far-future-set Juice. Head of books Alison Flood rounds up member thoughts

New Scientistabout 19 hours ago
'If a drug had the same benefits as the arts, we’d take it every day'

As the New Scientist Book Club embarks on its read for March, Art Cure, author Daisy Fancourt gives a sneak preview into the myriad ways in which the arts can improve our health