
Between February 15-21, 2026, tensions between the United States and Iran rapidly escalated from new oil sanctions to massive military buildup and threats of imminent attack. What began as economic pressure evolved into the largest U.S. military deployment to the Middle East since the 2003 Iraq invasion, with officials citing a 90% probability of military action. This timeline tracks the week when diplomatic negotiations and war preparations proceeded simultaneously.
13 events · 7 days · 24 source articles
President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu met at the White House and agreed to pursue maximum pressure against Iran, particularly targeting oil sales to China, which accounts for over 80% of Iran's oil exports. This economic strategy aimed to force Tehran into concessions during ongoing nuclear negotiations mediated by Oman. The move represented a significant escalation in economic warfare against Iran's primary revenue source.
Switzerland confirmed it would host the next round of indirect negotiations between the U.S. and Iran in Geneva, with Oman serving as diplomatic mediator. Despite declared readiness for a deal, Washington continued building military forces in the Middle East. Secretary of State Marco Rubio stated the U.S. needed sufficient power to ensure Iran 'doesn't make a mistake.'
During Geneva negotiations, Iran's delegation expressed willingness to suspend uranium enrichment for up to three years and transfer part of its uranium stockpiles to another country, possibly Russia. Iranian diplomats also indicated readiness to begin business relations with the U.S. This represented a significant diplomatic overture from Tehran, though it came amid growing military tensions.
American publication TWZ reported that the volume of military equipment being transferred to the Middle East indicated a potential operation lasting weeks, not days. The deployment included many capabilities necessary for a sustained air campaign. A second aircraft carrier strike group was approaching the region, and dozens of advanced fighters had been repositioned.
An unnamed adviser to President Trump told Axios that the probability of a major U.S. military operation against Iran in the coming weeks reached 90%. Simultaneously, Iran began fortifying nuclear bunkers, decentralizing command structures, and deploying naval forces in preparation for potential conflict. Iranian officials viewed this as the most serious military threat since 1988.
The Wall Street Journal reported that the U.S. was concentrating the largest aviation group in the Middle East since the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Advanced F-35 and F-22 fighters continued arriving, along with command-and-control aircraft crucial for coordinating major air operations and critical air defense systems. The second carrier strike group, USS Gerald Ford, was passing Gibraltar en route to the region.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov warned that new U.S. strikes on Iran could have negative consequences for the entire region and Russia. He noted that previous Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities under IAEA control had created real risks of a nuclear incident, undermining the authority of international institutions.
CNN and other U.S. media reported that the Pentagon had informed the White House that American military forces would be ready to conduct operations by the weekend if ordered by the president. However, President Trump had not yet given indications of a final decision. The U.S. continued both military preparations and diplomatic negotiations simultaneously.
The U.S. Department of Defense began withdrawing military personnel from bases in the Middle East, primarily to Europe and the U.S., as a precautionary measure in case of attack on Iran or potential Iranian retaliation. Pentagon sources stated these movements were standard procedure when the use of force was being considered, though the scale of naval deployment was exceptional.
President Trump announced at the inaugural 'Peace Council' meeting in Washington that Iran's leadership had 10-15 days to conclude a deescalation agreement. If Tehran refused, 'bad things' would happen, Trump warned. U.S. officials indicated they might authorize a limited strike first to convince Iranian authorities of the need for concessions before proceeding to full-scale operations aimed at regime change.
Axios reported that the United States was examining options including the elimination of Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and his son Mojtaba. An unnamed Trump adviser stated that the U.S. had options for every scenario, though even Trump himself hadn't decided which would ultimately be chosen. This option had allegedly been presented to the president several weeks earlier.
Reuters reported that Iran and the U.S. were rapidly sliding toward military conflict as hopes for diplomatic resolution over Tehran's nuclear program faded. Officials from both sides, along with Gulf and European diplomats, confirmed that Iran's neighbors and Israel now considered conflict more likely than settlement. Gulf states were preparing for possible spillover effects.
The New York Times published analysis from international experts warning that a potential U.S. military operation against Iran would be more protracted and dangerous than recent actions in Venezuela. Experts called for caution, citing Iran's powerful defensive capabilities and extensive regional influence network. Chatham House's Middle East director emphasized Iran's capacity for retaliation across the region.