
In March 2026, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard faced intense congressional scrutiny over contradictory intelligence assessments regarding Iran's nuclear capabilities and whether Tehran posed an imminent threat before the U.S.-Israel war began on February 28. The controversy was triggered by a top aide's resignation and revealed significant discrepancies between written and oral testimony about Iran's nuclear program.
13 events · 6 days · 22 source articles
The United States and Israel begin joint military strikes against Iran in an operation called 'Operation Epic Fury.' This follows previous attacks in June 2025 during a '12-day war' that targeted Iran's nuclear and missile facilities. The military campaign becomes the subject of intense debate over whether Iran posed an imminent threat.
Joe Kent, the top counterterrorism aide to Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, resigns in protest of the Trump administration's war in Iran. He becomes the first major official to resign over the conflict, citing concerns that Iran had not posed an imminent threat to the United States.
In her first comments following her aide's resignation, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard states that President Trump 'concluded that the terrorist Islamist regime in Iran posed an imminent threat and he took action.' This defense sets up a contentious hearing before Congress.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt publicly affirms that President Trump has full confidence in Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, despite the resignation of her top counterterrorism official Joe Kent over the Iran operation.
In her opening statement to the Senate Intelligence Committee's annual Worldwide Threats hearing, Gabbard states that 'the regime in Iran appears to be intact but largely degraded by Operation Epic Fury.' She acknowledges that Iran and its proxies remain capable of attacking U.S. and allied interests in the Middle East.
A critical contradiction surfaces when Gabbard skips over a portion of her prepared remarks stating Iran's nuclear program was 'obliterated' during oral testimony. Senator Jon Ossoff grills her on whether Iran posed an 'imminent nuclear threat.' Her written testimony claimed Iran made no effort to rebuild enrichment after June 2025 attacks, while her oral statement suggested Iran was trying to recover.
During Senate questioning, Senator Mark Warner presses Gabbard about her presence at an FBI raid at a Fulton County, Georgia election office earlier in the year. Gabbard deflects the criticism, adding another layer of controversy to her testimony.
Media outlets highlight that Gabbard's testimony about Iran making no effort to rebuild uranium enrichment after June 2025 directly contradicts President Trump's justifications for the ongoing war. Trump had repeatedly claimed Iran posed an imminent nuclear threat, but Gabbard's written testimony stated the enrichment program was obliterated with no rebuilding efforts.
During Senate testimony, Gabbard repeatedly dodges questions about whether President Trump had been warned about the fallout from the war, including Iran's attacks on Gulf nations and its effective closure of the vital Strait of Hormuz. She refuses to discuss her private conversations with the president about the war.
Political commentator Bill O'Reilly states that Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard 'lost all credibility' with President Trump for initially opposing the U.S. raid to capture ex-Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro in January, suggesting potential friction in their relationship.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth directly contradicts Gabbard's testimony by stating that President Trump could not tolerate Iran moving 'closer and closer' to obtaining nuclear capabilities. This statement comes just one day after Gabbard testified that such capabilities had been 'obliterated' in U.S. airstrikes last year, revealing divisions within the administration.
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard appears before the House for a second day of hearings on worldwide threats. She is again grilled on whether Iran was close to building nuclear weapons and if Tehran posed an 'imminent threat' before the war began. She is joined by CIA Director John Ratcliffe and FBI Director Kash Patel.
President Trump publicly indicates that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth was the first top administration official to back the U.S. military attacks against Iran, stating 'Pete, I think you were the first one to speak up and you said let's do it because you can't let them have a nuclear weapon.' This comment provides insight into internal deliberations and further highlights the contradictions in administration messaging.