What Happens if the US Strikes Iran ? 7 Possible Scenarios Explained

sikhsiyasatnews.net · Feb 20, 2026 · Collected from GDELT

Full Article

Chandigarh: The United States appears to be actively preparing for possible military action against Iran, significantly increasing its naval and air presence in the Middle East in recent weeks. If ongoing diplomatic talks fail and US leadership orders a strike, the primary targets would likely include bases linked to Iran’s Revolutionary Guards, missile production sites, and vital components of its nuclear programme. While the targets of a potential US strike are somewhat predictable, the aftermath is highly volatile. Based on geopolitical analyses, here are the potential scenarios that could unfold following a US military intervention in Iran: 1. Limited Strikes and Possible Political Change In an optimistic scenario for Washington, targeted air and naval strikes could severely weaken the Iranian leadership. If the establishment falls, it could theoretically pave the way for a move toward democracy. However, history paints a cautionary tale: past Western interventions in Iraq and Libya succeeded in removing rulers but were followed by years of devastating instability and power vacuums. 2. The Regime Survives but Adjusts Course Rather than collapsing, Iran’s leadership might absorb the military pressure and opt to stay in power by adjusting its policies. This “Venezuelan model” of survival would involve Tehran making strategic concessions—such as reducing its financial and military support for armed proxy groups in the region, limiting its nuclear and missile activities, and easing domestic crackdowns. However, considering Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei has maintained a rigid system highly resistant to outside pressure for decades, major systemic reform remains unlikely. 3. Collapse Followed by Military Rule If US strikes critically weaken the clerical establishment but civilian protests fail to seize control, Iran’s security forces could step into the void. The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) already holds immense sway over Iranian politics and the economy. In the chaotic aftermath of an attack, a junta or military-led government could easily emerge to restore order using force, preventing any democratic transition. 4. Iran Retaliates Against US Forces and Allies Iran has repeatedly warned that its “finger is on the trigger.” In the event of a US strike, Tehran is highly likely to retaliate using its vast arsenal of ballistic missiles and armed drones. Prime targets would include US military bases scattered across the Gulf, including those in Bahrain and Qatar. Iran could also expand the conflict by targeting regional countries it views as US allies, such as Israel or Jordan, dragging the broader Middle East into a direct war. 5. Disruption in the Strait of Hormuz One of Iran’s most potent asymmetric weapons is its geographical control over the Strait of Hormuz, a narrow waterway between Iran and Oman. Around 20% of the world’s oil and gas supplies pass through this maritime chokepoint. Iran could retaliate by laying sea mines or deploying fast-attack boats to interfere with international shipping. While this would cause a massive shock to global energy markets, it would also severely damage Iran’s own oil-dependent economy. 6. A Naval Clash in the Gulf A direct naval confrontation between US and Iranian forces is a major concern. The primary worry for the US Navy is a “swarm attack”—a coordinated assault where dozens of explosive-laden drones and fast-attack boats target a single warship simultaneously. The US currently has massive naval assets in the region, including aircraft carrier strike groups like the USS Gerald R Ford. While difficult, the sinking or severe damaging of a US warship would trigger a catastrophic and sharp escalation in the war. 7. Regime Collapse Followed by Chaos Perhaps the most dangerous outcome for the region is a total collapse of the Iranian leadership with no clear, unified authority to replace it. Iran is a vast nation of roughly 93 million people. A power vacuum could plunge the country into a brutal internal conflict. Ethnic minorities—including Kurds, Baluchis, and Azerbaijanis—might seize the opportunity to carve out autonomous zones, leading to civil war. Neighboring countries deeply fear this scenario, as it would inevitably trigger a massive refugee crisis and spillover violence. US Buildup to Result in Pressure to Act: Beyond the tactical and regional consequences, a major driving factor for a potential strike is domestic and geopolitical optics. Following a massive and highly publicized buildup of US military assets in the region—including multiple aircraft carrier strike groups and bomber deployments—the US administration may feel backed into a corner. Analysts warn that having “marched troops up to the top of the hill” with strict ultimatums, leadership might feel immense political pressure to launch a strike simply to avoid losing face or appearing weak on the global stage, even if the final endgame and long-term consequences remain completely unpredictable.