NewsWorld
PredictionsDigestsScorecardTimelinesArticles
NewsWorld
HomePredictionsDigestsScorecardTimelinesArticlesWorldTechnologyPoliticsBusiness
AI-powered predictive news aggregation© 2026 NewsWorld. All rights reserved.
Trending
TrumpTariffTradeAnnounceLaunchNewsPricesStrikesMajorFebruaryPhotosYourCarLotSayCourtDigestSundayTimelineSafetyGlobalMarketTechChina
TrumpTariffTradeAnnounceLaunchNewsPricesStrikesMajorFebruaryPhotosYourCarLotSayCourtDigestSundayTimelineSafetyGlobalMarketTechChina
All Articles
STAT+: Nature Medicine to investigate  study that found cancer treatment is better in morning
STAT News
Published 1 day ago

STAT+: Nature Medicine to investigate study that found cancer treatment is better in morning

STAT News · Feb 21, 2026 · Collected from RSS

Summary

Nature Medicine starts an investigation into inconsistencies in a study that found it was better to have immunotherapy in the morning.

Full Article

Angus Chen covers all issues broadly related to cancer including drugs, policy, science, and equity. He joined STAT in 2021 after covering health and science at NPR and NPR affiliate stations. His work has been recognized by national Edward R. Murrow awards, the June L. Biedler prize for cancer journalism, and more. You can reach Angus on Signal at angus.08.The notion that oncologists could boost immunotherapy responses simply by giving infusions in the morning, rather than late afternoon, is an attractive one. So, when a clinical trial published in Nature Medicine this month showed that lung cancer patients treated in the morning had a massive reduction in the risk of progression compared to those treated in the afternoon, many scientists were intrigued, if skeptical. Now that study is coming under fire, as multiple scientists and sleuths raise serious concerns about the data and point out inconsistencies in the trial. These have called the study’s conclusions even further into question, which experts told STAT already lacked strong biological plausibility, and Nature Medicine appended a note on the study on Thursday that it is starting an investigation into the concerns. Among the main concerns raised are inconsistencies in the trial design on its clinicaltrials.gov registration page, chronological errors in the submitted trial protocol, concerns related to the progression-free survival data, and oddities related to the side effect or adverse event data. Study authors declined to comment for this article, and told STAT in an email that they are first working on a response to Nature Medicine. STAT+ Exclusive Story Already have an account? Log in This article is exclusive to STAT+ subscribers Unlock this article — plus in-depth analysis, newsletters, premium events, and news alerts. Already have an account? Log in View All Plans To read the rest of this story subscribe to STAT+. Subscribe


Share this story

Read Original at STAT News

Related Articles

STAT News2 days ago
STAT+: DOJ, Ohio attorney general accuse OhioHealth of driving up prices, crowding out competition

Regulators say Ohio hospital system made it difficult for health insurers to offer cheaper plans.

STAT News2 days ago
STAT+: Up and down the ladder: The latest comings and goings

From new hires to departures, promotions and transfers, here are the latest comings and goings in the pharmaceutical industry.

STAT News2 days ago
STAT+: Element Biosciences launches table-top sequencer capable of $100 genome

And other biotech news brought to you by The Readout newsletter

STAT News2 days ago
STAT+: Pharmalittle: We’re reading about an FDA official’s speech, a Grail cancer blood test, and much more

The FDA's top drug regulator indicated in her first address to staff that she will scrutinize antidepressants and shots used to protect babies from RSV

STAT News2 days ago
ACIP meeting postponed, for reasons that are unclear

And other health news from today's Morning Rounds newsletter

STAT News2 days ago
Opinion: STAT+: Sometimes, it would be unethical not to use AI in medicine

“We do not let pilots fly without instrument support simply because they technically could. Why should medicine be different?”