Significant progres made during US and Iran talks but no sign of a deal yet

sbs.com.au · Feb 27, 2026 · Collected from GDELT

Full Article

IN briefIran and the United States have ended talks in Geneva without a deal but with "significant progress", according to mediators.More discussions are scheduled for next week in Austria.The United States and Iran made progress in talks over the latter's nuclear program on Thursday, mediator Oman said, but hours of negotiation ended with no sign of a breakthrough that could avert potential US strikes amid its massive military build-up in the Middle East.The two sides plan to resume negotiations soon after consultations in their countries' capitals, with technical-level discussions scheduled for next week in Vienna, Omani foreign minister Sayyid Badr Albusaidi said in a post on X after the day's meetings in Switzerland.Any substantial move toward an elusive agreement between the longtime foes could reduce the imminent prospects for US President Donald Trump to carry out a threatened attack on Iran that many fear could escalate into a wider war. But this week's talks wrapped up without a deal, still leaving the region on edge.Badr Albusaidi's upbeat assessment followed indirect talks between Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi and US envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner in Geneva, with one session in the morning and the second in the afternoon."We have finished the day after significant progress in the negotiation between the United States and Iran," Badr Albusaidi said.But with many analysts seeing the latest diplomacy as the last chance before Trump could decide to go to war, Badr Albusaidi gave no details and stopped short of saying the two sides had overcome their biggest stumbling blocks to a deal.Describing the talks as some of the most serious that Iran has had with the US, Araghchi told Iranian state television: "We reached agreement on some issues, and there are differences regarding some other issues.""It was decided that the next round of negotiations will take place soon, in less than a week."The Iranians, he added, had clearly expressed their demand for lifting of US sanctions, which the US has long insisted will only come after deep concessions from Iran.There was no immediate comment from the US negotiating team on the outcome of the talks. But US-based news outlet Axios quoted a senior US official as saying the Geneva negotiations were "positive".Iran's nuclear program is a major sticking point in the negotiations. Source: SBS NewsThe discussions about the decades-long dispute over Iran's nuclear work come as fears grow of a Middle East conflagration. Trump has repeatedly threatened action if there is no deal, and the US military has amassed its forces in waters near the Islamic Republic.A senior Iranian official told the Reuters news agency earlier on Thursday that the US and Iran could reach a framework for a deal if the US separated "nuclear and non-nuclear issues".The Trump administration has insisted that Iran's ballistic missile program and its support for armed groups in the region must be part of the negotiations.Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi (left) told Iranian state television negotiators had "reached agreement on some issues, and there are differences regarding some other issues". Source: AAP / EPA / Iranian foreign ministryAfter the morning session, Badr Albusaidi said the two sides had exchanged "creative and positive ideas".But a senior Iranian official said at the time that some gaps still had to be narrowed.The US, which believes Iran seeks the ability to build a nuclear bomb, wants Iran to give up all uranium enrichment, a process that makes fuel for atomic power plants but that can also yield material for a warhead.Iran has long denied wanting a bomb and said earlier on Thursday it would show flexibility at the talks. Reuters reported on Sunday that Iran was offering undefined new concessions in return for removal of sanctions against it and recognition of its right to enrich uranium.US secretary of state Marco Rubio said on Wednesday that Iran's refusal to discuss its ballistic missile program was a "big problem" that would have to be addressed eventually.The missiles were "designed solely to strike America" and pose a threat to regional stability, he said, but offered no proof to back the claim that US territory could be targeted.On 19 February, Trump said Iran must make a deal in 10 to 15 days, warning that "really bad things" would otherwise happen.He briefly laid out his case for a possible attack on Iran in his State of the Union speech this week, underlining that while he preferred a diplomatic solution, he wouldn't allow Iran to obtain a nuclear weapon.In June 2025, the US joined Israel in hitting Iranian nuclear sites and has been ramping up the pressure on Iran again since January this year, when Trump threatened to intervene over its crushing of nationwide protests in which thousands of people were killed.Since then, Trump has deployed fighter jets and aircraft carrier strike groups in the region.Iran responded to last summer's strikes by firing fusillades of missiles at Israel and has threatened to retaliate fiercely if attacked again, raising fears of a wider regional conflict that has alarmed Gulf oil producers.Within Iran, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei faces the gravest crisis of his 36-year tenure, with an economy buckling under tightened sanctions and renewed protests following the major unrest and crackdown in January.Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian said on Thursday that Khamenei has banned weapons of mass destruction, which "clearly means Tehran won't develop nuclear weapons", reiterating a religious decree issued in the early 2000s.For the latest from SBS News, download our app and subscribe to our newsletter.