Reflection vs . rumination : Is medical education harming students ?

kevinmd.com · Feb 22, 2026 · Collected from GDELT

Full Article

Reflection has become one of the core virtues of contemporary health professional education. From journaling assignments to mindfulness prompts to competency-based portfolios, students are repeatedly asked to look inward. Reflection is framed as the doorway to insight, empathy, and professional identity formation. But an uncomfortable question is beginning to surface in hallway conversations and faculty retreats: Can too much reflection, or reflection done poorly, actually harm our learners? At first glance, this seems counterintuitive. Decades of scholarship affirm that reflective practice deepens learning and strengthens clinical reasoning. Mann and colleagues famously describe reflection as essential for developing thoughtful, self-aware clinicians. But psychological research tells a more complex story. When reflection is constant, uncontained, or evaluative, it can slip into something that looks less like growth and more like rumination. Rumination is repetitive, negative, and self-critical thinking strongly associated with imposter phenomenon, anxiety, and depression. Today’s medical students are already navigating record levels of perfectionism and mental health strain. When reflection turns into rumination A third-year student recently shared excerpts from her reflective journal, something she initially enjoyed and found grounding. Early entries showed thoughtful observations about patient interactions. But over time, the tone shifted: “Did I sound stupid during rounds? Why do I keep missing things? Do I even belong here?” Her journal had become a repository of self-doubt rather than insight. This pattern mirrors what psychologists describe: Introspection without structure can become cyclical self-criticism, not reflective learning. Dewey viewed reflection as a process of inquiry oriented toward insight and future action. Rumination, by contrast, loops endlessly without resolution. And for many high-achieving, self-pressuring medical students, that loop becomes all too familiar. Why today’s students are over-reflecting Several forces unique to this generation make over-reflection more common. They have grown up in a culture of metrics and self-optimization: Young adults track their steps, sleep, mood, productivity, and grades. In this context, reflection can morph from exploration into yet another arena to perfect. Instead of clarifying experience, it becomes self-monitoring. Social media amplifies self-consciousness: Platforms encourage constant comparison of achievements, aesthetics, and accomplishments. Research has linked this to lower self-esteem and increased anxiety. When students enter reflective assignments with this mindset, they often worry less about what they learned and more about how they will be perceived. Graded reflection distorts authenticity: Once tied to assessment, reflection becomes performance. Students produce polished narratives that align with faculty expectations rather than honest accounts of confusion, error, or growth. Vulnerability becomes risky. Reflection becomes surveillance. Emotional skills are often underdeveloped: Young health professional learners confront suffering, death, moral distress, and error early in their training. Asking them to reflect deeply on these experiences without emotional regulation tools can overwhelm rather than strengthen them. Instead of insight, they experience emotional flooding. The psychology of over-reflection Excessive reflection adds cognitive load to an already demanding environment. Students begin to monitor every action, misstep, and interaction. For perfectionistic learners, already abundant in medicine, this internal scrutiny can feel like an additional exam they can never pass. Emotional amplification compounds the issue. Revisiting painful or unsettling clinical moments without support can intensify distress instead of resolving it. Reflection becomes emotional re-exposure. Some students spiral into identity instability, interpreting isolated failures as evidence that they don’t belong in medicine at all. In this space, reflection becomes a magnifying glass not on learning, but on inadequacy. We don’t need more reflection; we need better reflection The answer isn’t to abandon reflection but to use it wisely. When structured and guided, reflection strengthens meaning-making, resilience, and professional identity. Research shows that supported reflection reduces stress and enhances coping, but only when learners aren’t left alone with it. Healthy reflection has boundaries, uses clear frameworks, and happens in conversation rather than isolation. It focuses on growth, not judgment, and includes emotional skills like grounding and cognitive reframing. Most importantly, students must learn the difference between genuine reflection and rumination, because without that distinction, introspection meant to help them grow can quietly begin to erode their confidence instead. Final thoughts Reflection remains a powerful tool in medical education but only when used with intention. In a generation already steeped in self-evaluation and comparison, unstructured or excessive reflection can unintentionally magnify distress, perfectionism, and doubt. The goal is not to ask our learners to reflect more, but to reflect wisely. When done well, reflection clarifies rather than clouds, strengthens rather than burdens, and helps young clinicians grow into their best professional selves and not lose themselves along the way. Vijay Rajput is an internal medicine physician. Seeth Vivek is a psychiatrist.